policenauts in english
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 3:03 pm
my copee of policenauts is in japaneese and i cant reed it. a little help?
Kojima Games: Snatcher, Policenauts, Metal Gear, ZOE and Boktai
http://forums.junkerhq.net/
d00d, where did u git the romz at?! i hav a frend that speeks japanees so we r gonna hak the game in2 enlish 4 u all. ne1 no how 2 h4x0r the gamez? im pritty l33t LOLzOsiris wrote:my copee of policenauts is in japaneese and i cant reed it. a little help?
What happens if you betray Sony? Will they stop being your friend?ratperson665 wrote:my loyalties lye with Sony and I don't want to betray them.
You do realize that sounds VERY immature right?Modnar wrote:SATURN SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!PSX IS THE BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I already admitted that the Sega Saturn version is the best version. You’re beating a dead horse with all these insults.Osiris wrote:I don't think anyone needs to try to do that.
Thank you. Your post was just what I needed.Missing wrote:But nevertheless, you started this topic with the intent of continuing this foolish debate with ratperson, did you not? You're the one at fault for trying to provoke him (or perhaps just to mock him, which is no better), and I would call that beating a dead horse, since the other topic he started has already been closed.
Well, it would be a dead horse if it were an honest debate or discussion, which it clearly was not. It is a few members of this forum having some fun at the expense of someone who has irritated the ever-living hell out of us. I understand what you are saying and I applaude you for trying to stick up for the guy, but he has seriously brought this type of mockery on himself. He can ignore the topic if he wishes. No one is forcing him to read it.Missing wrote:But nevertheless, you started this topic with the intent of continuing this foolish debate with ratperson, did you not? You're the one at fault for trying to provoke him (or perhaps just to mock him, which is worse), and I would call that beating a dead horse, since the discussion he originally started has already ended.
I already apologized for annoying you guys. There's no need to make jokes at my expense.James_The_Stampede wrote:Well, it would be a dead horse if it were an honest debate or discussion, which it clearly was not. It is a few members of this forum having some fun at the expense of someone who has irritated the ever-living hell out of us. I understand what you are saying and I applaude you for trying to stick up for the guy, but he has seriously brought this type of mockery on himself. He can ignore the topic if he wishes. No one is forcing him to read it.Missing wrote:But nevertheless, you started this topic with the intent of continuing this foolish debate with ratperson, did you not? You're the one at fault for trying to provoke him (or perhaps just to mock him, which is worse), and I would call that beating a dead horse, since the discussion he originally started has already ended.
So after his series of pointless threads, I'm not entitled to make one to try to make him realize how annoying he is to everyone here? It looks like he's got it, though. (He only apologized after I started this thread, by the way.)Missing wrote:But nevertheless, you started this topic with the intent of continuing this foolish debate with ratperson, did you not? You're the one at fault for trying to provoke him (or perhaps just to mock him, which is worse), and I would call that beating a dead horse, since the discussion he originally started has already ended.
What pointless threads?Osiris wrote:So after his series of pointless threads, I'm not entitled to make one to try to make him realize how annoying he is to everyone here? It looks like he's got it, though. (He only apologized after I started this thread, by the way.)Missing wrote:But nevertheless, you started this topic with the intent of continuing this foolish debate with ratperson, did you not? You're the one at fault for trying to provoke him (or perhaps just to mock him, which is worse), and I would call that beating a dead horse, since the discussion he originally started has already ended.
Even if he was just trying to be a prick, you're doing no better by creating this topic. You're better off ignoring him if he really bothers you. As it is, you're only drawing this feud out longer.Osiris wrote:So after his series of pointless threads, I'm not entitled to make one to try to make him realize how annoying he is to everyone here? It looks like he's got it, though. (He only apologized after I started this thread, by the way.)
It was all a misunderstanding. I didn't mean to annoy anyone.Missing wrote:Even if he was just trying to be a prick, you're doing no better by creating this topic. You're better off ignoring him if he really bothers you. As it is, you're only drawing this feud out longer.Osiris wrote:So after his series of pointless threads, I'm not entitled to make one to try to make him realize how annoying he is to everyone here? It looks like he's got it, though. (He only apologized after I started this thread, by the way.)
I was hoping to show him what his behavior was like for everyone else here. In the future, if he posts topics like the ones he did before, they're going to get locked (sometimes he doesn't even respond when people try to help him - case in point: viewtopic.php?t=925). I hope he's sincere with his resolution.Missing wrote:Even if he was just trying to be a prick, you're doing no better by creating this topic. You're better off ignoring him if he really bothers you. As it is, you're only drawing this feud out longer.Osiris wrote:So after his series of pointless threads, I'm not entitled to make one to try to make him realize how annoying he is to everyone here? It looks like he's got it, though. (He only apologized after I started this thread, by the way.)